BUSINESS LAW

.docx

School

Community College of Allegheny County *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

MISC

Subject

Business

Date

Apr 29, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by MinisterPorpoise752 on coursehero.com

Touchstone 2: Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car? Kevin Perrin Business Law I (LEG 100) April 4, 2021 Touchstone 2: Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car? 1 | P a g e
Touchstone 2: Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car? A legal contract, in essence, is a set of promises that are made between two or more parties that are enforceable by law. In a legal contract, one party will make a promise to another party in exchange for something of benefit. Contracts can be verbal or written. It involves one party making an offer and the other accepting it. There are six (6) elements of a valid contract. These are offer, consideration, acceptance, mutuality of obligation, legality and capacity, and certainty. When an offer is made, one of the parties has promised to do or not to do a specific action in the future. Jim and Laura offered to give Stan $100 to hold on to the car for one day which constitutes this first step. Consideration involves an item of value which can be in the form of a promise, an object or an act. This is what the promiser receives from the promise in return for his promise. In this case, the $100 that Jim and Laura gave to Stan was the item of value that Stan received with the promise of holding the car for the couple. Acceptance is an agreement to the terms of the offer that was made. The acceptance must be communicated to the person making the offer. In this case, silence does not mean consent. Mutuality of obligation means that all parties involved understand and agree to the terms and basic substance of the contract (1). Both parties are bound to perform their obligations, otherwise, the law will treat the agreement as if neither of the parties are bound to perform (2). Legality and capacity mean that not only should the contract be legal and enforceable, meaning the agreement must relate to a legal purpose, but the parties must be legally able to enter into the contract. For example, a person that is not of sound mind cannot legally enter into a contractual agreement. Certainty is achieved when parties are able to reach a complete and final agreement of all the terms and conditions before the contract begins. There was no contract made for the purchase of the automobile. Based on the scenario, after Jim and Laura drove the blue 4-door sedan, they decided that they liked this car more than 2 | P a g e
Touchstone 2: Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car? the others they test drove. The agreement was that they would give Stan $100 to hold the car for them for 1 day. Stan explicitly stated that the money was refundable, meaning if they changed their minds, they would be able to get the money back. There was no conversation between the parties that this deposit was for the purchase of the car, but rather to hold on to the car for one day. While an offer and consideration are present in this scenario, acceptance is not present. To fulfill this step in a valid contract, the individuals involved must agree to the terms of the offer. As such, Stan should have advised them that in taking the money, they would be obligated to purchase the car as that money would be applied to its cost, and they would have to agree to this. Each party left thinking the money was for a different purpose. Jim and Laura thought it was to keep the car for one day while they decided if they wanted to go forward with the purchase, and Stan believed it was an initial deposit for the purchase of the car. A contract cannot be binding if the terms are not explicitly stated and both parties agree to them. In addition to the absence of acceptance, mutuality of obligation was not present. In this step, both parties must agree to the same terms. Jim and Laura must agree to purchase the car and Stan must agree that he will hold on to the car because the couple gave him a deposit for him to do so. However, no agreement was made that the car would be purchased. Stan was asked to “hold on” to the car. This suggests that after the period of time has ended (1 day), Stan is no longer obligated to hold on to the car for them. The car will be eligible for sale to whoever else is interested in buying it. This does not suggest that this money should be used towards the purchase of the car. In fact, even though no documents were signed, Stan verbally advised the couple that they would be able to get their money back. In addition, while legality and capacity are present, certainty does not exist. There was no complete or final agreement between the parties in regard to the car. No documents were drafted or signed that stated that the couple has 3 | P a g e
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help