BUSINESS LAW
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Community College of Allegheny County *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MISC
Subject
Business
Date
Apr 29, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by MinisterPorpoise752 on coursehero.com
Touchstone 2: Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car?
Kevin Perrin
Business Law I (LEG 100)
April 4, 2021
Touchstone 2: Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car?
1 | P a g e
Touchstone 2: Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car?
A legal contract, in essence, is a set of promises that are made between two or more parties that are enforceable by law. In a legal contract, one party will make a promise to another party in exchange for something of benefit. Contracts can be verbal or written. It involves one party making an offer and the other accepting it. There are six (6) elements of a valid contract. These are offer, consideration, acceptance, mutuality of obligation, legality and capacity, and certainty. When an offer is made, one of the parties has promised to do or not to do a specific action in the future. Jim and Laura offered to give Stan $100 to hold on to the car for one day which constitutes this first step. Consideration involves an item of value which can be in the form of a promise, an object or an act. This is what the promiser receives from the promise in return for his promise. In this case, the $100 that Jim and Laura gave to Stan was the item of value that Stan received with the promise of holding the car for the couple. Acceptance is an agreement to the terms of the offer that was made. The acceptance must be communicated to the person making the offer. In this case, silence does not mean consent. Mutuality of obligation means that all parties involved understand and agree to the terms and basic substance of the contract (1). Both parties are bound to perform their obligations, otherwise, the law will treat the agreement as if neither of the parties are bound to perform (2). Legality and capacity mean that not only should the contract be legal and enforceable, meaning the agreement must relate to a legal purpose, but the parties must be legally able to enter into the contract. For example, a person that is not of sound mind cannot legally enter into a contractual agreement. Certainty is achieved when parties are able to reach a complete and final agreement of all the terms and conditions before the contract begins. There was no contract made for the purchase of the automobile. Based on the scenario, after Jim and Laura drove the blue 4-door sedan, they decided that they liked this car more than 2 | P a g e
Touchstone 2: Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car?
the others they test drove. The agreement was that they would give Stan $100 to hold the car for them for 1 day. Stan explicitly stated that the money was refundable, meaning if they changed their minds, they would be able to get the money back. There was no conversation between the parties that this deposit was for the purchase of the car, but rather to hold on to the car for one day. While an offer and consideration are present in this scenario, acceptance is not present. To fulfill this step in a valid contract, the individuals involved must agree to the terms of the offer. As such, Stan should have advised them that in taking the money, they would be obligated to purchase the car as that money would be applied to its cost, and they would have to agree to this. Each party left thinking the money was for a different purpose. Jim and Laura thought it was to keep the car for one day while they decided if they wanted to go forward with the purchase, and Stan believed it was an initial deposit for the purchase of the car. A contract cannot be binding if the terms are not explicitly stated and both parties agree to them.
In addition to the absence of acceptance, mutuality of obligation was not present. In this step, both parties must agree to the same terms. Jim and Laura must agree to purchase the car and
Stan must agree that he will hold on to the car because the couple gave him a deposit for him to do so. However, no agreement was made that the car would be purchased. Stan was asked to “hold on” to the car. This suggests that after the period of time has ended (1 day), Stan is no longer obligated to hold on to the car for them. The car will be eligible for sale to whoever else is
interested in buying it. This does not suggest that this money should be used towards the purchase of the car. In fact, even though no documents were signed, Stan verbally advised the couple that they would be able to get their money back. In addition, while legality and capacity are present, certainty does not exist. There was no complete or final agreement between the parties in regard to the car. No documents were drafted or signed that stated that the couple has 3 | P a g e
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
Which of the following statements regarding discharge of contracts is FALSE?
1) All parties are relieved of their obligations if the contract is discharged.
2) Party A need not pay for any goods received from Party B if Party A willingly
accepts the partial performance of the contract by Party B.
3) A contract that becomes more expensive or difficult to perform will not be
automatically discharged.
O 4) A contract will be discharged if it becomes impossible subsequently to
perform the contract.
arrow_forward
The following situations generally require a contract to be in writing:
• sales of land
• purchases of goods over $500
• promises made in consideration of marriage
⚫ contracts that cannot be completed in less than one year
•
a contract in which one person promises to pay the debt of
another person
This legal concept is known as
offer and acceptance
promissory estoppel
the statute of frauds
et lux perpetua luceat eis
arrow_forward
2) A fiduciary relationship is one based on trust and explicit or implicit contract that creates economic incentives for the different parties.
Select an alternative
True
False
arrow_forward
In relation to Consideration select the CORRECT statement:Select one:To be valid, the agreed price and the goods sold, must be of equal value.Consideration can be vague or illusory as long as it was communicated to the other partyConsideration is the exchange of something of value (a thing, a promise, money etc), given in return for something else of value (a thing, a promise, money etc)Consideration is not necessary to form a legally binding contractTo be valid, Consideration must involve payment of money, in return for something of value.
arrow_forward
Max and Jack enter into a contract which states: "Jack will paint Max's kitchen blue and Max promises to pay Jack $200 upon completion." Which is an example of an implied condition?
That Max will pay Jack upon completion of the painting.
That Jack will use blue paint when painting Max's kitchen.
That Max will allow Jack access to his kitchen
That Max will pay Jack $200.
arrow_forward
1) summarizing whether you believe that contracts are promises
2) Analysis whether and why contracts and promises should be treated the same or differently
3) in your analysis, consider the potential economic, legal and moral consequences of your answer.
arrow_forward
Sue Flay's Cakery promises to pay Oscar Ruitt not to park in a city-designated no-parking zone in
front of her store. This agreement is:
(Choose all of the correct answers.)
Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt has no legal right to park in a city-designated no-parking zone
Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt never made any enforceable promise to Sue Flay's Cakery
Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt is merely making an illusory promise
Enforceable because Oscar Ruit is giving up the right to do something he would otherwise have the right to
do
Enforceable because Sue Flay's Cakery is offering legally sufficient consideration to Oscar Ruitt
arrow_forward
DEFINITIONS
Define or give the meaning of the following:
Consent-
Acceptance-
Natural elements-
Option contract
Mistake of law
DISCUSSIONS
When is a contract voidable or annullable?
Is it always required that he who alleges fraud or mistake in entering into a contract, must prove hiss allegation? Explain.
Give the requisites in order that intimidation may vitiate or annul consent of a party to a contract.
May fraud be commuted by a party to a contract though there is no mis interpretation on his part? Explain.
Will the acceptance of a business advertisement of a thing for sale produce the perfection of a contract? Explain.
PROBLEMS
Explain or state briefly the rule or reason for your answer.
In a contract containing an option period, when is the offerer not allowed to withdraw his offer even before acceptance by the offeree? When is the offerer allowed to withdraw his offer even after acceptance?
S sold his house to B believing that B was C. Can S legally…
arrow_forward
In 2010, X and B agreed that they will pretend that they will enter into a contract of sale so that X will have a lesser tax to pay. In the contract of sale, it was indicated that X will sell the car for P50Million to which B agreed. What is this kind of contract?
A. Absolute simulation
B. Relative simulation
C. Factual simulation
D. Fictional simulation
arrow_forward
Which of the following is true of a severable contract?
Multiple Choice
It must be enforced or rejected in its entirety.
It contains multiple parts that need to be performed collectively.
It has both legal and illegal portions in the contract.
It needs complete performance by both parties.
arrow_forward
If a loan shark promises you $500 if you will rough up one of his nonpaying customers to encourage prompt repayment, what sort of contract is this?
a.Valid
b.Void
c.Voidable
d.Enforceable
arrow_forward
Conditions precedent Multiple Choice Render a contract frustrated Render a contract void at the option of the injured party Must occur before a contract can be cancelled Must occur before a contract is enforceable Render a contract void immediately
arrow_forward
Tying contracts, which is prohibited under the Clayton Act, refers to the situation where a producer requires that a buyer: O Can resell the product but only at a higher price than the original purchase price O Cannot buy a similar product from other producers if that buyer wants to continue buying its product O Buy another of its products as a condition for buying the desired product 4 O Cannot ever resell the product bought
arrow_forward
21)According to the objective theory of contracts, the intent to enter into an express or implied-in-fact contract is judged by the ______
doctrine of equity
reasonable person standard
legality of the contract
common law of contracts
arrow_forward
A contract of sale is distinct from other types of contracts because it has two additional requirements for validity. In order for a valid sale agreement to be concluded, the parties must agree oni) the object of sale andii) on the purchase price.
arrow_forward
1. According to the 1980 United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, an agreement on a price is required for a contract for the sale of goods to be valid?
a. Yes, if the contract is done by writing.
b. Yes, article 14 of the convention provides for it.
c. No, the price is always unilaterally determined by the seller.
d. No, article 50 regulates the case of the valid conclusion of a contract for the sale of goods without determination of the price.
e. Yes, if the value of the contract is more than € 10.000.
2. Choose a contracting State to the 1980 United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods that is not bound by article 11, article 29 or Part II of the Convention that allows a contract of sale to be done in any form other than in writing:
a. Finland
b. United States of America
c. Mexico
d. Canada
e. Belarus
3. Albert is a merchant selling cars. Bob offered € 5.000 for a car which price announced by Albert was € 10.000.…
arrow_forward
1. Which of the following describes when a person does not understand that a contract is being made or does not understand its general nature due to a mental condition caused by medication, drugs, alcohol, illness, or age.
Factual incapacity
Status incapacity
Infactual incapacity
Illegal incapacity
2. It’s possible the validity of a contract may be affected if one or both parties made a mistake.
True
False
3. Which of the following is not a problem area in determining whether the parties to a contract have genuinely agreed to be bound by the terms:
Lack of contractual capacity
Deception
Pressure
Privity of contract
Mistake
arrow_forward
Oliver, while he was so drunk that he didn’t know what he was doing, bid successfully at an auction for the purchase of a house. It was clear to the auctioneer that Oliver didn’t know what he was doing. However, after Oliver sobered up, he confirmed the contract with the auctioneer. He then subsequently refused to complete the contract. Is Oliver bound to the contract? Required: Answer this question using the IRAC * method.
arrow_forward
Bill offers to sell Mary his computer for $500. Mary counters with an offer of $400
Bill rejects this offer. Mary tells Bill: "OK, I'll buy the computer for $500." Bill tells
Mary: "I've decided not to sell the computer after all." Bill is in breach of contract
because Mary made a valid offer.
True
False
arrow_forward
1. State the issue in this case.
2. State the contract in this case.
3. State the elements of contract in this case.
arrow_forward
1. A contract to sell real estate is generally not enforceable unless it is in writing.
a) True
b) False
arrow_forward
In which type of Contract is there a "lack of meeting of the minds?"
a)
Bilateral
b)
Unilateral
c)
Fraudulent
d)
Oral
2. Generally where a unilateral mistake is made in a Contract, the Contract will still be enforced, except where the non-mistaken party was aware of the mistake.
a) True
b) False
3. A home builder misjudges the cost of the windows to be installed in the house. This is:
a)
Bilateral mistake leading to rescission.
b)
Unilateral mistake which can be corrected.
c)
A mathematical mistake which is correctable.
d)
An error of judgment, not correctable.
4. "Sign or I'll kill you" is an example of:
a)
Undue Influence
b)
Misrepresentation
c)
Duress
d)
either a or b
5. An attorney who over a period of time convinces an elderly widow to deed…
arrow_forward
Joe took out a loan to purchase a new house. In
return, Joe's lender placed a lien on the
property. Is this legal?
O No. Only Joe can place a lien his property.
O No. A lender is never allowed to place a lien on
a property as long as the borrower is up-to-date
ontheir payments.
О
Yes. This is a voluntary mortgage lien that
allows the lender to foreclose on the
property if Joe defaults on the loan.
O Yes. However, the lien is only valid for 12
months.
arrow_forward
X, the owner of a house and lot in Quezon City, gave an option to A to purchase said property for P1,000,000.00 within 90 days from May 1, 1999. A gave X one hundred thousand (P100,000) as option money. Before the expiration of the 90-day period, A went to X to exercise his option and to pay the purchase price but X refused because somebody wanted to buy his property for P1,500,000.00 and because there was no sufficient of withdrawal of the offer which was received by B at 5:00 P.M. Was the contract perfected? Reasons.
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Related Questions
- Which of the following statements regarding discharge of contracts is FALSE? 1) All parties are relieved of their obligations if the contract is discharged. 2) Party A need not pay for any goods received from Party B if Party A willingly accepts the partial performance of the contract by Party B. 3) A contract that becomes more expensive or difficult to perform will not be automatically discharged. O 4) A contract will be discharged if it becomes impossible subsequently to perform the contract.arrow_forwardThe following situations generally require a contract to be in writing: • sales of land • purchases of goods over $500 • promises made in consideration of marriage ⚫ contracts that cannot be completed in less than one year • a contract in which one person promises to pay the debt of another person This legal concept is known as offer and acceptance promissory estoppel the statute of frauds et lux perpetua luceat eisarrow_forward2) A fiduciary relationship is one based on trust and explicit or implicit contract that creates economic incentives for the different parties. Select an alternative True Falsearrow_forward
- In relation to Consideration select the CORRECT statement:Select one:To be valid, the agreed price and the goods sold, must be of equal value.Consideration can be vague or illusory as long as it was communicated to the other partyConsideration is the exchange of something of value (a thing, a promise, money etc), given in return for something else of value (a thing, a promise, money etc)Consideration is not necessary to form a legally binding contractTo be valid, Consideration must involve payment of money, in return for something of value.arrow_forwardMax and Jack enter into a contract which states: "Jack will paint Max's kitchen blue and Max promises to pay Jack $200 upon completion." Which is an example of an implied condition? That Max will pay Jack upon completion of the painting. That Jack will use blue paint when painting Max's kitchen. That Max will allow Jack access to his kitchen That Max will pay Jack $200.arrow_forward1) summarizing whether you believe that contracts are promises 2) Analysis whether and why contracts and promises should be treated the same or differently 3) in your analysis, consider the potential economic, legal and moral consequences of your answer.arrow_forward
- Sue Flay's Cakery promises to pay Oscar Ruitt not to park in a city-designated no-parking zone in front of her store. This agreement is: (Choose all of the correct answers.) Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt has no legal right to park in a city-designated no-parking zone Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt never made any enforceable promise to Sue Flay's Cakery Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt is merely making an illusory promise Enforceable because Oscar Ruit is giving up the right to do something he would otherwise have the right to do Enforceable because Sue Flay's Cakery is offering legally sufficient consideration to Oscar Ruittarrow_forwardDEFINITIONS Define or give the meaning of the following: Consent- Acceptance- Natural elements- Option contract Mistake of law DISCUSSIONS When is a contract voidable or annullable? Is it always required that he who alleges fraud or mistake in entering into a contract, must prove hiss allegation? Explain. Give the requisites in order that intimidation may vitiate or annul consent of a party to a contract. May fraud be commuted by a party to a contract though there is no mis interpretation on his part? Explain. Will the acceptance of a business advertisement of a thing for sale produce the perfection of a contract? Explain. PROBLEMS Explain or state briefly the rule or reason for your answer. In a contract containing an option period, when is the offerer not allowed to withdraw his offer even before acceptance by the offeree? When is the offerer allowed to withdraw his offer even after acceptance? S sold his house to B believing that B was C. Can S legally…arrow_forwardIn 2010, X and B agreed that they will pretend that they will enter into a contract of sale so that X will have a lesser tax to pay. In the contract of sale, it was indicated that X will sell the car for P50Million to which B agreed. What is this kind of contract? A. Absolute simulation B. Relative simulation C. Factual simulation D. Fictional simulationarrow_forward
- Which of the following is true of a severable contract? Multiple Choice It must be enforced or rejected in its entirety. It contains multiple parts that need to be performed collectively. It has both legal and illegal portions in the contract. It needs complete performance by both parties.arrow_forwardIf a loan shark promises you $500 if you will rough up one of his nonpaying customers to encourage prompt repayment, what sort of contract is this? a.Valid b.Void c.Voidable d.Enforceablearrow_forwardConditions precedent Multiple Choice Render a contract frustrated Render a contract void at the option of the injured party Must occur before a contract can be cancelled Must occur before a contract is enforceable Render a contract void immediatelyarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education