Select Search
-----
All Bartleby.com
-----
All Reference
-----
Columbia Encyclopedia
World History Encyclopedia
Cultural Literacy
World Factbook
Columbia Gazetteer
American Heritage Coll.
Dictionary
Roget's Thesauri
Roget's II: Thesaurus
Roget's Int'l Thesaurus
Quotations
Bartlett's Quotations
Columbia Quotations
Simpson's Quotations
Respectfully Quoted
English Usage
Modern Usage
American English
Fowler's King's English
Strunk's Style
Mencken's Language
Cambridge History
The King James Bible
Oxford Shakespeare
Gray's Anatomy
Farmer's Cookbook
Post's Etiquette
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Bulfinch's Mythology
Frazer's Golden Bough
-----
All Verse
-----
Anthologies
Dickinson, E.
Eliot, T.S.
Frost, R.
Hopkins, G.M.
Keats, J.
Lawrence, D.H.
Masters, E.L.
Sandburg, C.
Sassoon, S.
Whitman, W.
Wordsworth, W.
Yeats, W.B.
-----
All Nonfiction
-----
Harvard Classics
American Essays
Einstein's Relativity
Grant, U.S.
Roosevelt, T.
Wells's History
Presidential Inaugurals
-----
All Fiction
-----
Shelf of Fiction
Ghost Stories
Short Stories
Shaw, G.B.
Stein, G.
Stevenson, R.L.
Wells, H.G.
Reference
>
Cambridge History
>
Later National Literature, Part III
>
Scholars
> Richard Grant White
Henry Norman Hudson
Horace Howard Furness
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes
(190721).
VOLUME XVIII. Later National Literature, Part III.
XXV.
Scholars
.
§ 41. Richard Grant White.
Richard Grant Whites
Shakespeares Scholar
(1854) criticized acutely the manuscript corrections in J. P. Colliers then famous and afterward notorious Perkins Folio. White did not at first believe that these had been forged by Collier, and he considered that many of them had intrinsic merit; but he demonstrated that they were not early emendations, and were wholly without authority as such. His edition of Shakespeare (185766) and his later
Studies in Shakespeare
(1885), though they retain certain characteristics of the Romantic School, exhibit on the whole a healthy reaction against it such as became the friend of Lowell and of Norton. White is romantically inclined to a personal interpretation of Shakespeares
Sonnets
and of many of the speeches in the plays, believing in particular that Ulysses in
Troilus and Cressida
is Shakespeares own mouthpiece. On the other hand, he anticipates the later non-idealistic school in regarding Shakespeare as intent simply on writing plays that will pay, and as having no system of dramatic art. Whites text is based upon a careful examination of the Folios and Quartos, accepting the first Folio as generally authentic. In the matter of emendations he is exceedingly cautioustoo cautious to suit Lowell.
22
Whites notes and commentary in general endeavour simply to put the reader face to face with Shakespeare, and his edition as a whole is justly recognized as combining scholarship with attention to the needs of the general reader.
69
Note 22
. Lowells anonymous review (
Atlantic Monthly,
Jan.-Feb., 1857) deserves to be reprinted.
[
back
]
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
Henry Norman Hudson
Horace Howard Furness
Click
here
to shop the
Bartleby Bookstore
.
Welcome
·
Press
·
Advertising
·
Linking
·
Terms of Use
· © 2008
Bartleby.com