Select Search
-----
All Bartleby.com
-----
All Reference
-----
Columbia Encyclopedia
World History Encyclopedia
Cultural Literacy
World Factbook
Columbia Gazetteer
American Heritage Coll.
Dictionary
Roget's Thesauri
Roget's II: Thesaurus
Roget's Int'l Thesaurus
Quotations
Bartlett's Quotations
Columbia Quotations
Simpson's Quotations
Respectfully Quoted
English Usage
Modern Usage
American English
Fowler's King's English
Strunk's Style
Mencken's Language
Cambridge History
The King James Bible
Oxford Shakespeare
Gray's Anatomy
Farmer's Cookbook
Post's Etiquette
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Bulfinch's Mythology
Frazer's Golden Bough
-----
All Verse
-----
Anthologies
Dickinson, E.
Eliot, T.S.
Frost, R.
Hopkins, G.M.
Keats, J.
Lawrence, D.H.
Masters, E.L.
Sandburg, C.
Sassoon, S.
Whitman, W.
Wordsworth, W.
Yeats, W.B.
-----
All Nonfiction
-----
Harvard Classics
American Essays
Einstein's Relativity
Grant, U.S.
Roosevelt, T.
Wells's History
Presidential Inaugurals
-----
All Fiction
-----
Shelf of Fiction
Ghost Stories
Short Stories
Shaw, G.B.
Stein, G.
Stevenson, R.L.
Wells, H.G.
Roberts Rules of Order Revised
>
Subject Index
> Page 300
PREVIOUS
NEXT
CONTENTS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
·
SUBJECT INDEX
Henry M. Robert
(18371923).
Roberts Rules of Order Revised.
1915.
Page 300
Where a church is of a strictly congregational or independent organization, and the property held by it has no trust attached to it, its right to the use of the property must be determined by the ordinary principles which govern ordinary associations.
Where the local congregation is itself a member of a much larger and more important religious organization and is under its government and control and is bound by its orders and judgments, its decisions are final and binding on legal tribunals.
Courts having no ecclesiastical jurisdiction, cannot revise or question ordinary acts of church discipline; their only judical power arises from the conflicting claims of the parties to the church property and the use of it.
But while the civil courts have no ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and cannot revise or question ordinary acts of church discipline, they do have jurisdiction where there are conflicting claims to church property. An independent church by an almost unanimous vote decided to unite with another independent church. A very small minority, less than ten per cent, did not wish to unite with the other church, so they were voted letters of dismission to any other church of like faith and order, against their protest. The majority then directed the trustees to transfer their property to the other church and voted themselves a letter of dismission to unite with that church. The church then voted to disband. The majority presented their letters and were received into the other church. The minority would not use their letters, but took the matter into the courts, which, of course, decided that they were the church and owned the property. According to the practice of churches of the same denomination, no member can be forced out of the church unless
CONTENTS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
·
SUBJECT INDEX
PREVIOUS
NEXT
Click
here
to shop the
Bartleby Bookstore
.
Welcome
·
Press
·
Advertising
·
Linking
·
Terms of Use
· © 2008
Bartleby.com