When using a C++ inclusion guard on a library interface file, why is it essential that the symbol or name used in the guard not be identical to any other uses of the symbol or name in the guard? Assuming that the symbol does not need to be unique and then showing what occurs when two libraries that are to be #included in the same application sharing the same symbol is an effective use of the proof by contradiction technique in this circumstance. Here, we have an actual application.

When using a C++ inclusion guard on a library interface file, why is it essential that the symbol or name used in the guard not be identical to any other uses of the symbol or name in the guard? Assuming that the symbol does not need to be unique and then showing what occurs when two libraries that are to be #included in the same application sharing the same symbol is an effective use of the proof by contradiction technique in this circumstance. Here, we have an actual application.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Why does the C++ inclusion guard on a library interface file need a unique symbol or name? Assume that the symbol does not need to be unique and then show what happens when two libraries that are to be #included in the same application both use the same symbol. This is an example of proof by contradiction.
Why is it essential that the symbol or name used in the C++ inclusion guard on a library interface file be distinct from all other instances of that symbol or name? Proof by contradiction is a useful strategy to employ in this situation because it allows one to presuppose that the symbol does not need to be unique and then demonstrate what happens when two libraries that are to be #included in the same application share the same symbol. In this case, the application.
Why must the symbol or name used in the C++ inclusion guard on a library interface file be unique? In this scenario, proof by contradiction is useful—presume that the symbol does not need to be unique and show what happens when two libraries to be #included in the same application share the same symbol?
Is there a special reason why the symbol or name used in the C++ inclusion guard on a library interface file has to be special? A helpful tactic in this situation is to use proof by contradiction: assume that the symbol doesn't need to be unique, and then show what happens when two libraries that are both #included in the same application use the same symbol.
For what reason is it necessary for the symbol or name used in the C++ inclusion guard on a library interface file to be unique? In this case, proof by contradiction is a useful strategy to employ — presume that the symbol does not need to be unique and demonstrate what occurs when two libraries to be #included in the same application share the same symbol.
Why must the symbol/name used in C++'s inclusion guard on a library interface file be unique? (Hint: A good technique to use here is proof by contradiction -- assume that the symbol needn't be unique and show what happens when two libraries to be #include'd in the same program share the same symbol.)
Why must the symbol or name in the C++ inclusion guard on a library interface file be unique? In this case, proof by contradiction may be used to postulate that the symbol does not need to be unique and show what occurs when two libraries to be #included in the same application share the same symbol. Example: the programme.
1. Is the binding between a C variable and its memory location static (i.e., determined at compile time) for all variables, dynamic for all variables, or does it depend on the variable. 2. If it is the same for all variables, explain why. 3. If it is variable-dependant, give an example of a type of variable with each type of binding.
In C++, how simple is it to duplicate an array of shared pointers into a new array? Create a list of potential solutions to the issue at hand. Do the objects controlled by a shared pointer also get copied when it's copied? Explain
Why must the symbol or name used in the C++ inclusion guard on a library interface file be distinct? Assume that the symbol does not need to be unique in this situation and show what happens when two libraries that are going to be #included in the same application share the same symbol.
The question should be done in C++, please give explanation and running result. 1. For this question, we need to provide more information about where the mismatch of the text file is happening. Write a recursive function called list_mismatched_lines that takes 2 filenames as input arguments and displays to the screen all mismatched lines in those files. This function should use hashing techniques and shall not compare strings to detect mismatch. The signature of this function should be: void list_mismatched_lines(std::string file1, std::string file2); In file1.txt, it contains "My dear C++ class. I hope that you enjoy this assignment. " In file2.txt, it contains "My dear C++ class. I hope that you like this assignment. " Example: Running the following line of code, should print to the screen the mismatched lines only, from both files. list_mismatched_lines(file1, file2); The following output should be seen on the screen: file1.txt: I hope that you enjoy this assignment.file2.txt:…
In C++, how can one easily duplicate a set of shared pointers into another array? Make a list of various solutions to the situation you've been given. Is it true that copying shared pointers also copies the objects they manage? Explain