Can the prediction be correct? If not, what is wrong?

Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
13th Edition
ISBN:9781133382119
Author:Swokowski
Publisher:Swokowski
Chapter7: Analytic Trigonometry
Section7.6: The Inverse Trigonometric Functions
Problem 94E
icon
Related questions
Question
Listed
below are the overhead widths (cm) of seals measured from photographs and weights (kg) of the seals. Find the regression equation, letting the overhead width be the predictor (x) variable.
Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 2.1 cm, using the regression equation. Can the prediction be correct? If not, what is wrong? Use a
significance level of 0.05.
Overhead Width (cm)
Weight (kg)
7.2
132
7.4
170
9.8
268
9.4
224
8.9
225
8.4
209
Q
The regression equation is y=-162+ (43.1)x.
(Round the y-intercept to the nearest integer as needed. Round the slope to one decimal place as needed.)
The best predicted weight for an overhead width of 2.1 cm, based on the regression equation, is -71.5 kg.
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Can the prediction be correct? If not, what is wrong?
OA. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data.
OB. The prediction cannot be correct because a weight of zero does not make sense and because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation.
OC. The prediction cannot be correct because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data.
OD. The prediction can be correct.
Transcribed Image Text:Listed below are the overhead widths (cm) of seals measured from photographs and weights (kg) of the seals. Find the regression equation, letting the overhead width be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 2.1 cm, using the regression equation. Can the prediction be correct? If not, what is wrong? Use a significance level of 0.05. Overhead Width (cm) Weight (kg) 7.2 132 7.4 170 9.8 268 9.4 224 8.9 225 8.4 209 Q The regression equation is y=-162+ (43.1)x. (Round the y-intercept to the nearest integer as needed. Round the slope to one decimal place as needed.) The best predicted weight for an overhead width of 2.1 cm, based on the regression equation, is -71.5 kg. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Can the prediction be correct? If not, what is wrong? OA. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data. OB. The prediction cannot be correct because a weight of zero does not make sense and because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. OC. The prediction cannot be correct because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data. OD. The prediction can be correct.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781337282291
Author:
Ron Larson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Trigonometry
ISBN:
9781337278461
Author:
Ron Larson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781938168383
Author:
Jay Abramson
Publisher:
OpenStax
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt